Jagmohan Singh etc. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; CWP-14688-2000 (O&M) and CWP-18975-1998, Jag Mohan Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others; decided 14.05.2025 by Tribhuvan Dahiya, J.; R. S. Mamli for petitioners; Tanushree Gupta (DAG, Haryana) for the State; A. S. Virk for respondent no.3/University; University's contention: petitioners retired between 2001 to 2010 and admissible benefits under the rules already given prior thereto; petitioner counsel had no instructions; both connected petitions dismissed for want of prosecution; photocopy of order to be placed on connected file; no statutes cited, no cases cited, no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
In view of learned counsel for the petitioners having no instructions in the matters, both connected writ petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution, and a photocopy of the order is to be placed on the connected file.