Disposed¶16

Paramvir Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Aug 2025CWP/10546/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Illegal mining; Punjab; representation pending with authorities; Annexure P-16; CWP-10546-2025 (O&M); direction to decide representation by speaking order; opportunity of hearing to both parties; two-month timeline; no expression of opinion on merits; Paramvir Singh v. State of Punjab; disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to examine the petitioner's grievance and decide the representation regarding the alleged illegal mining by respondent No.8 by passing a speaking order, after granting opportunity of hearing to both parties, within two months. ¶16

Paramvir Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents ought to be directed to examine the petitioner's grievance and decide his representation regarding the alleged illegal mining activities carried out by respondent No.8.

¶14

Court's answer

The petition was disposed of by directing the respondents to examine the petitioner's grievance and decide the representation regarding the alleged illegal mining by respondent No.8.

¶14

Ratio / Principle

The representation was to be decided by passing a speaking order, after granting opportunity of hearing to both the parties, within a period of two months.

¶14

Key takeaways

The order shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case of either party; the competent authority shall examine the concerns/grievances of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.ratio¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Paramvir Singh v. State of Punjab and others, CWP-10546-2025 (O&M) (P&H HC, decided 25.08.2025): Alleging illegal mining activities by respondent No.8 and non-action on multiple representations, including a comprehensive representation (Annexure P-16), the petitioner sought redressal. The State counsel submitted that the representation shall be dealt with as per law. The Division Bench disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to examine the petitioner's grievance and decide the representation regarding the alleged illegal mining by respondent No.8 by passing a speaking order, after granting opportunity of hearing to both the parties, within a period of two months, clarifying that the order shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits and that the competent authority shall act strictly in accordance with law.

Paramvir Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paramvir Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Kumar Vs Home Secretary Haryana and Others

Naved Khan No. 1187/FBD Vs State of Haryana and Others

Tarun Vs Arvind Rai Dig Gcc Crpf Pinjore

Asi Naresh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Swaran Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others