Dismissed¶5

Munesh v. Rohtash and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Jul 2025CRR/3490/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRR-3490-2018 (O&M); Munesh v. Rohtash and others; Punjab & Haryana High Court; Alok Jain, J.; decided 21.07.2025; revision against acquittal dated 21.02.2017; FIR No.42 dated 22.01.2010; Sections 406, 498-A, 506 IPC; Police Station Civil Lines, Gurugram; dowry harassment allegations; appeal dismissed 02.08.2018 by Additional Sessions Judge; petitioner failed to prove allegations; revision petition dismissed; miscellaneous applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner failed to prove the allegations levelled, the learned Court below rightly acquitted the respondents. ¶4

Munesh Vs Rohtash and Others — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CRR-3490-2018 (O&M)

¶2

-:1:-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

(227)

¶5

CRR-3490-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 21.07.2025

MUNESH

… Petitioner

Versus

ROHTASH AND OTHERS

... Respondents

-.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN

¶13

Present:Mr. Mehak Sawhney, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶14

¶15

ALOK JAIN, J . (Oral)

¶16

Present revision petition has been filed inter alia challenging the order dated 21.02.2017 whereby the trial Court had acquitted the respondent in FIR No.42 of dated 22.01.2010 registered under Sections 406, 498-A, 506, IPC, at Police Station Civil Lines, Gurugram and order dated 02.08.2018 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the learned Court of Additional Sessions Judge and upheld the judgment of the learned trial Court. Thereafter the present revision petition was filed, which is pending since 2018.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner has clearly submits that the parties have already taken divorce and have moved ahead in life. However, learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that despite there being serious allegations and cogent evidence on record to prove the fact that the

¶18

GAURAV SOROT 2025.07.24 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CRR-3490-2018 (O&M)

¶20

-:2:-

¶21

petitioner was being harassed, taunted and beaten for dowry, the learned Court below did not appreciate the same and acquitted all the four accused.

¶22

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length and have gone through the orders thoroughly.

¶23

Learned Court below has dealt with each and every aspect of the matter and since the petitioner has failed to prove the allegations levelled, the learned Court below have rightly acquitted the respondents.

¶24

In view of the above, finding no merits in the present revision petition, the same is hereby dismissed.

¶25

Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands also disposed of.

¶26

( ALOK JAIN ) 21.07.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No

¶27

GAURAV SOROT 2025.07.24 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Munesh v. Rohtash and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munesh v. Rohtash and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudesh and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation Faridabad and Ors.

Simranjeet Kaur Vs Amandeep Singh

Charanjit Kaur and Others Vs Davinder Singh and Another

Ritu Malhotra Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rekha Chhoker Vs Parveen Chhokar

Mithlesh Sharma Vs Shankar Lal