Disposed¶20

M/S Shiva Rice Traders v. Pb. St. Coop. Sup. Mkt. Fed. Ltd.

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Dec 2025CRR/1046/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRR-1046-2009; M/s Shiva Rice Traders v. Punjab State Cooperative Supplies Marketing Federation Ltd.; Punjab and Haryana High Court; Vinod S. Bhardwaj J.; decided 17.12.2025; Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act conviction; trial judgment 12.07.2006 Judicial Magistrate Ist Class Samana; appeal No.12-T dismissed by Sessions Judge Patiala 30.03.2009; revision disposed as abated on death of petitioner-accused; pending miscellaneous applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

The present revision petition is disposed of as having been abated on account of the death of the petitioner-accused. ¶20

M/S Shiva Rice Traders Vs Pb. St. Coop. Sup. Mkt… — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CRR-1046-2009

¶2

¶3

140 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRR-1046-2009 Decided on: 17.12.2025

¶5

M/s Shiva Rice Traders

¶6

.... Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

Punjab State Cooperative Supplies Marketing Federation Ltd.

¶9

.... Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

¶11

Present: None.

¶12

Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)

¶13

Present revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 12.07.2006 passed in criminal complaint No.131 dated 30.10.2000 by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Samana in complaint titled as ‘Punjab State Cooperative Supplies Marketing Federation Ltd. vs. M/s Shiva Rice Traders’ under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘the Act’).

¶14

Vide said judgment, the petitioner had been convicted for commission of offence under Section 138 of the Act and had been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/-. The criminal appeal bearing No.12-T dated 04.08.2006 against the aforesaid judgment was dismissed by Sessions Judge, Patiala vide judgment dated 30.03.2009, hence, the present revision petition.

¶15

Since there had been no representation on behalf of the petitioner, notice was issued to the petitioner vide order dated 03.12.2025. 4. As per office report, the petitioner is reported to have died. No one has chosen to appear on behalf of the petitioner to contest the present

¶16

SONIA BURA 2025.12.19 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

CRR-1046-2009

¶18

¶19

petition. It seems that legal representatives of the petitioner are no more interested in pursuing the matter.

¶20