Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Bhagat Ram Verma Vs Virender Kumar — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Punjab & Haryana HC
2025
Bhagat Ram Verma Vs Virender KumarBhagat Ram Verma v. Virender Kumar

Dismissed¶8

Bhagat Ram Verma v. Virender Kumar

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Jul 2025CRM-A/775/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bhagat Ram Verma v. Virender Kumar | CRM-17652-2025 in/and CRM-A-775-2025 | High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh | decided 08.07.2025 | Sumeet Goel, J. | dismissal for non-prosecution | non-appearance of appellant despite case called twice | condonation of delay application dismissed along with main appeal | no advocates present | short oral order, no substantive holdings.

What did the court decide?

The case was called twice since morning and none caused appearance on behalf of the appellant. ¶7

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Ratio / Principle

The case was called twice since morning and none caused appearance on behalf of the appellant.

Key takeaways

Consequently, the application for condonation of delay as well as the main case (appeal) are dismissed for non-prosecution.ratio¶8

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Punjab & Haryana High Court (Chandigarh) — CRM-17652-2025 in/and CRM-A-775-2025, Bhagat Ram Verma (appellant) v. Virender Kumar (respondent); decided 08.07.2025 by Sumeet Goel, J. (oral order). The case was called twice since morning; none appeared for the appellant ('Present: None'). Accordingly, both the application for condonation of delay and the main appeal were dismissed for non-prosecution. No merits were examined; no statute or precedent was cited.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

(110) CRM-17652-2025 in/and CRM-A-775-2025 Decided on : 08.07.2025 Bhagat Ram Verma ……Appellant(s) Versus Virender Kumar

……Appellant(s) Versus ……Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present: None.

***** Sumeet Goel (Oral):

Case has been called twice since morning. None has caused appearance on behalf of the appellant.

Ergo , the application for condonation as also the main case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(SUMEET GOEL) July 08, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.08 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Bhagat Ram Verma¶2
respondent
Virender Kumar¶2

Coram

AI extract

Sumeet Goelauthor¶4

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Punjab & Haryana HC
Decided on: 8 Jul 2025 · July
Registered: 30 Apr 2025
Case no.: CRM-A/775/2025
CNR: PHHC010450722025
Bench: Sumeet Goel
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: CRM-A

All orders in this case

2 orders share this CNR

8 Jul 2025Order 1 — this page · Sumeet Goel
2 Sept 2026Order 2

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Sumeet Goel

M/S Vardhman Industries Vs M/S Supra Casting and Another
7 Jul 2025
Swati Vs Anita Rani
7 Jul 2025
Kusum Gupta Vs State Bank of Patiala Karamchari Coop & Ors.
7 Jul 2025
Mintu Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Another
8 Jul 2025
Ravdeep Singh Alias Ravi Vs State of Punjab
8 Jul 2025
Arun Deep @ Arun Deep Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Another
8 Jul 2025

Cite this judgement

Bhagat Ram Verma v. Virender Kumar, CRM-A/775/2025 (P&H), decided on 8 July 2025.

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sumeet Goel

Parties & counsel