Disposed¶17

Lalita Devi v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Apr 2025CRM-M/698/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court; CRM-M-698-2025; Lalita Devi v. State of Haryana; decided 01.04.2025; Anoop Chitkara J.; regular bail under Section 483 BNSS; FIR No. 266 dated 04.06.2024; PS City Hisar; Sections 18(b), 27-A, 29, 31 NDPS Act; petition withdrawn with liberty to file fresh bail plea citing care of minor children; pending applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh bail petition (per contents of para 6) on the ground of taking care of minor children, disclosing their present residence, caretaker and ages; all pending applications disposed of. ¶17

Lalita Devi Vs State of Haryana — Narcotics (NDPS) | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

287/1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-698-2025

¶3

Decided on:01.04.2025

¶4

Lalita Devi .... Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana

.... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶9

Present: Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Naveen K. Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

¶11

¶12

Anoop Chitkara, J. (Oral)

¶13

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
266	04.06.2024	City Hisar, Hisar	18(b) NDPS Act (Sections 27-A, 29 and 31 of NDPS Act added later on)

¶14

The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above seeking

¶15

regular bail has come before this Court under Section 483 BNSS.

¶16

After arguing for some time, while facing stiff resistance from the State, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one as per contents of para 6 of the present petition wherein she is seeking bail on the ground of taking care of minor children, one of them is a girl of vulnerable age while disclosing all the facts i.e. where minor children are residing presently, who is taking care of them and their age etc.

¶17

Given above, present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. All pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

01.04.2025 sonia

(ANOOP CHITKARA)

JUDGE

Whether speaking/non-speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶22

SONIA BURA 2025.04.03 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Lalita Devi v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalita Devi v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vivek Kumar Alias Vivek Badhan Vs State of Punjab

Akash Kaushik Vs State of Punjab

Satpal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Bobby Wadhwa Vs State of Punjab

Rupinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Ram Kumar and Another Vs State of Haryana