Ram Kumar and Another v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab & Haryana HC, CRM-M-17770-2025, decided 01.04.2025, Anoop Chitkara J.: anticipatory bail under S. 482 BNSS allowed to Ram Kumar and another apprehending arrest in FIR No. 95 dated 15.03.2025, PS Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Ss. 115(2), 333, 3(5) BNS); roles/injuries not specific or serious; conditions include joining investigation within seven days, deemed custody for S.27 IEA/S.23 BSA, bond and non-tampering conditions; speaking/reasoned: Yes; reportable: No.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted in the FIR subject to furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/concerned Court/nearest Illaqa Magistrate-Duty Magistrate; petitioners to join investigation within seven days of upload of the order and as and when called (deemed custody for S.27 Evidence Act/S.23 BSA purposes); compliance with statutory bond conditions and no tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses; bail deemed extended to newly added sections prescribing a maximum sentence not greater than those invoked, with minimum seven days' notice if a graver section is added; State may seek cancellation before the Sessions Court if petitioners indulge in any non-bailable offence.