Ajay Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Present: Ms. Sunita Devi, Advocate for Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners (in CRM-M-2929-2025) for respondents No.2 & 3 (in CRM-M-3032-2025).

¶14

Mr. A.S.Saini, Advocate for the petitioners (in CRM-M-3032-2025), for respondents No.2 & 3 (in CRM-M-2929-2025).

¶15

Mr. Iqbalpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

¶16

¶17

SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

¶18

It is a case of version and cross-version. Petitioners in CRM-M2929-2025 are seeking quashing of FIR No.75 dated 21.06.2022, under Sections 379, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC (Section 326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Zira District Ferozepur and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, whereas petitioners in CRM-M-3032- 2025 are seeking quashing of G.D.R. No.37 dated 21.06.2022 under Sections 323, 324,

¶19

SONIA BURA 2025.11.14 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

-2-

¶21

CRM-M-2929-2025 and CRM-M-3032-2025

¶22

148, 149 IPC and SC/ST Act added later on, registered at P.S. Zira District Ferozepur, as a cross-version case in FIR No.75, dated 21.06.2022, under Sections 379, 324, 323, 148, 149 of IPC (Section 326 of IPC added later on), and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise/affidavits dated 22.01.2024 and 07.12.2024 (Annexures P-2 and P-3 respectively), arrived at between the parties.

¶23

Vide order dated 22.01.2025, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise.

¶24

Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Zira, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the GDR and FIR qua the accusedpetitioners are quashed.

¶25

The trial Court has annexed the photocopies of the statements of the parties along with its report. The relevant part of the said report is reproduced here-below:

¶26

Sr. No.	Description
1(i)	Total number of persons found involved as accused in the dispute	4 accused, 1 expired
(ii)	Total number of persons found involved as accused in the dispute	6 in GDR

¶27

SONIA BURA 2025.11.14 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶28

CRM-M-2929-2025 and CRM-M-3032-2025

¶29

-3-

¶30

2	Number of complainant/victim(s)	2 in FIR 2 in GDR
3	Whether all the accused and complainant / victims areparty to compromise & signed the same	Yes
4	In case, any affected person (accused or complainant) is left out or not arrayed as party in the quashing petition before High Court, detail whereof; OR	No
	His/her statement is still to be recorded, in compliance to the direction of this Court, details of suchperson	No
5	Whether any accused has been declared as a proclaimed offender/person or any such proceedings against him/her have been initiated or pending adjudication	No
6	Report of the Court whether compromise is genuine, voluntary, and without any coercion or undue influence	Yes
7	Any other aspect relevant to the present case.	No

¶31

Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused

¶32

other than the petitioners and the private respondents No.2 and 3 are the only aggrieved person in the FIR and the GDR in question.

¶33

In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Zira, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 , the instant petitions are allowed. The aforesaid FIR, GDR and all consequential proceedings arising out of them, are quashed.

¶34