Sabir and Another Vs State of Haryana and Another

This is a petition under Section 528 of BNSS, Act 2023 praying for quashing of FIR No. 431, dated 27.07.2022 (Annexure P-1), under Section 420/406 IPC, 1860, later on added 467/468/471 and 120-B IPC registered at P.S. Tehsil Camp Panipat, District Panipat and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavit (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties.

¶16

During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR.

¶17

Anuradha 2025.05.29 05:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CRM-M-25664-2025 (O&M)

¶19

2

¶20

Vide order dated 12.05.2025, parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court and report with regard to the genuineness of the compromise was called for.

¶21

The report dated 23.05.2025 has been received from Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panipat, stating that the parties have entered into a compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.

¶22

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that he has no objection if the petition is allowed.

¶23

Full Bench of this Court in ‘ Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052’ , has held:-

¶24

“ The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C. which can affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the proceedings even in noncompoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., in order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice.

¶25

The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is to be exercised ExDebitia Justitia to prevent an abuse of process of Court. There can neither be an exhaustive list nor the defined para-meters to enable a High Court to invoke or exercise its inherent powers. It will always depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has no limits. However, the High Court will exercise it sparingly and with utmost care and caution. The exercise of power has to be with circumspection and restraint. The Court is a vital and an extraordinary effective instrument to maintain and control social order. The Courts play role of paramount importance in achieving peace, harmony and ever- lasting congeniality in society. Resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a Court which should endeavour to give full effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or would promote savagery.”

¶26

The legal principles as laid down for quashing of the judgment

¶27

Anuradha 2025.05.29 05:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶28

CRM-M-25664-2025 (O&M)

¶29

3

¶30

were also approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of ' Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012) 10 SCC 303'.

¶31

Furthermore, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of ' Parbatbhai

¶32

Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another” (2017) 9 SCC 641 '.

¶33

It is evident that in view of the amicable resolution of the issues amongst the parties, no useful purpose would be served by continuation of the proceedings. The furtherance of the proceedings is likely to be a waste of judicial time and there appears to be no chances of conviction.

¶34

In view of above, FIR No. 431, dated 27.07.2022 (Annexure P- 1), under Section 420/406 IPC, 1860, later on added 467/468/471 and 120-B IPC registered at P.S. Tehsil Camp Panipat, District Panipat and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavit (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties, is quashed qua the petitioner(s).

¶35

The present petition is hereby allowed.

¶36

28.05.2025 anuradha

¶37

(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE

¶38

Whether speaking/non-speaking :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶39

Anuradha 2025.05.29 05:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sabir and Another v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabir and Another v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pardeep Alias Jhola and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Om Parkash Vs Kul Bahadur

Jaswinderjit Singh & Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Nitname Singh Vs State of Punjab

Deepak Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Nirvail Singh Alias Nirvair Singh Alias Nirvail and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others