Amit @ Sumit v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Duplicate/multiple bail petitions; misuse of process of law; dismissal of both petitions with costs of Rs.10,000/- each payable to Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Lawyers Family Welfare Fund; regular bail under S. 483 BNSS 2023 sought in FIR No.389 dated 07.11.2024 under S. 6 POCSO Act 2012, P.S. Ambala City, District Ambala; petitioner Amit @ Sumit; State of Haryana represented by A.A.G.; decided 22.04.2025 by Justice Namit Kumar.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner has filed two petitions seeking regular bail through the same counsel, which the Court characterises as a total misuse of process of law. ¶10