Anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS in an FIR involving BNS sections; State and complainant pointed out a false declaration concealing seven other FIRs against the petitioner. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
105
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12318-2025 Date of Decision: 05.03.2025
SURINDER SINGH
...Petitioner
Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sukhdev Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Sarabjeet Singh Randhawa, Advocate for the complainant.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (Oral)
| FIR | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | |||
| 130 | 29.07.2024 | Sidhwan Bet, District | 110, 117(2), 190, 191 and |
| Ludhiana (Rural) | 351 BNS section 110 BNS | ||
| was deleted but Sections | |||
| 109, 115(2), 118(1), | |||
| 140(3) and 324(2) BNS | |||
| have been added |
The petitioner incarcerated in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023.
MAMTA 2025.03.11 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-12318-2025
-2-
05.03.2025 M.Sikka
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
MAMTA 2025.03.11 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surinder Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
