Disposed¶17
Ranbir Saini v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11640/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Expedition of trial / speedy disposal request; FIR No.235 dated 21.08.2020, PS Sector 9-A, Gurugram; offences under Ss.148, 149, 307, 302 IPC, S.25 Arms Act, with Ss.120-B, 216 IPC added later; petition under S.528 BNSS r/w Article 21; consistency with Court's earlier directions in CRM-M No.50701 of 2024; Court declined to intervene in trial Court's docket and requested top-priority expedited trial; petition disposed of. Bench: Anoop Chitkara, J. Counsel: Sanjeev Majra (petitioner); Trishanjali Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana (respondent).
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of; pending applications, if any, stood disposed of; the operative effect was a request (not a directive interference) to the trial Court to expedite the trial on top priority. ¶17