Punjab and Haryana High Court; CR-3781-2014 (O&M); civil revision; dismissal in default; want of prosecution; no representation by petitioners; adjournment refused; Deepak Gupta, J.; decided 09-07-2025; counsel: B.K. Bagri for Respondent No.1.
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and no justification to adjourn the matter. ¶10
206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-3781-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 09, 2025
Shyam Sunder (Since deceased) through LRs …Pe��oner
Versus
Phool Chand and another …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None for the pe��oners.
Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate for respondent No.1.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the pe��oners. There is
no jus�fica�on to adjourn the ma�er.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
July 09, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2025.07.09 16:55 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
1 issue framed by the court
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
