Disposed¶25

Surjit Kaur v. Jagtar Singh Sangha

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Feb 2025CR/231/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Article 227 Constitution of India; revision petition CR-231-2025; refusal of time-bound disposal direction; expeditious disposal request to Trial Court; NRI Court Jalandhar; Civil Judge (Senior Division); Civil Suit No.4055 dated 03.10.2023; mandatory injunction; vacant possession; property No.54 Defence Colony Jalandhar; NRI litigant inconvenience; suit pending at evidence stage; Punjab and Haryana High Court; Justice Archana Puri; Surjit Kaur v. Jagtar Singh Sangha.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition disposed of with a request to the learned Trial Court to look into expeditious disposal of Civil Suit No.4055 in accordance with law; no time-bound direction issued. ¶25

Surjit Kaur Vs Jagtar Singh Sangha — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CR-231-2025

¶2

�

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Sr. No.171

¶5

CR-231-2025 Date of Decision: 21.02.2025

SURJIT KAUR

....Petitioner

Versus

JAGTAR SINGH SANGHA

¶10

.....Respondent

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

¶12

Present:Mr. C.L.Verma, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Dassaur and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner.

¶13

¶14

ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)

¶15

The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this court, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, thereby making prayer for issuance of appropriate order/direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) (NRI Court), Jalandhar, to decide the Civil Suit No.4055 dated 03.10.2023 titled “ Surjit Kaur v/s Jagtar Singh Sangha” .

¶16

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the suit was filed by the petitioner, who is NRI, for seeking mandatory injunction against the defendant, to hand over the vacant possession of the property bearing No.54, Defence Colony, Jalandhar. It is further submitted that the said suit was filed in the year 2023 and is still pending at the stage of evidence of the petitioner/plaintiff. It is also submitted that lot of inconvenience is caused to the petitioner, who is NRI, on account of pendency of the said suit.

¶17

In view of the submissions aforesaid, even though, with due regard to the convenience/inconvenience of the parties concerned, no such

¶18

Sonu 2025.02.21 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC

¶19

�

¶20

CR-231-2025

¶21

direction can be given to the concerned court, to dispose of the case, in a time bound manner, while considering the age of the suit.

¶22

But anyhow, learned Trial Court is hereby requested to look