Amita Bansal v. Sahil Gupta
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer application by a housewife applicant seeking transfer of a Section 9 Hindu Marriage Act petition pending at a place about 80 kilometres from her residence, citing care of her two-year-old son and lack of independent means.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
TA-594-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.201
TA-594-2024 Date of Decision: 13.12.2024
�������������
....Applicant
Versus
�����������
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. B.S. Chahal, Advocate for the applicant (through video conferencing).
Mr. Abhinav Kalia, Advocate for the respondent.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a wife with no independent income should be relieved of travelling about 80 km to defend a restitution of conjugal rights petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Coram
Archana Puri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- TA/594/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court