Revision petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner stated that the underlying civil suit had already been decided by the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.239
CR-698-2018 Date of Decision: 13.12.2024
�����������
....Petitioner
Versus
������������������
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Sukhdevi Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for respondents No.2 and 5.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (ORAL)
At this stage, the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the civil suit has already been decided by learned Trial Court and the present revision petition be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) 13.12.2024 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
Himanshu
Sonu 2024.12.13 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC
Petitioner
Respondents No.2 and 5
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
