Saroj v. Navdeep
Case brief
What is this about?
Wife sought transfer of husband's divorce petition from Jhajjar to Rohtak, where the domestic violence proceedings are pending and she cares for an autistic minor child; the husband had earlier withdrawn a restitution of conjugal rights petition at Rohtak. Much of the order text is OCR-corrupted and the operative outcome is not clearly legible.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
TA-112-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.236
TA-112-2024 Date of Decision: 06.08.2024
������
....Applicant
Versus
�������
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a wife's divorce proceedings should be transferred from Jhajjar to Rohtak given her difficulty defending while caring for an autistic minor child.
Coram
Archana Puri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- TA/112/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court