Revision petition withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel at the hearing; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.278
CR-7227-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.08.2024
PANKAJ KUMAR
....Petitioner
Versus
MADHU BALA AND ANR
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Himanshu Setia, Advocate for Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue with the present revision petition, which may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) 05.08.2024 JUDGE ���� Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SonuAnu 2024.08.05 18:212024.08.06 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and I attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this document P&HHCintegrity of this document
Pankaj Kumar
Madhu Bala
Anr.
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
