Case file destroyed in a Registry fire; parties failed to take steps for reconstruction despite repeated reminders. The court dismissed the 2002 case for non-prosecution, with pending applications also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
206-4
STC-7-2002 Decided on : 12.12.2024
M/s Madhu Travels and Roadways . . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: None.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
December 12, 2024 J.Ram
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JAWALA RAM 2024.12.13 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
M/s Madhu Travels and Roadways
State of Haryana
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
