A 2002 case file was burnt in a Registry fire; parties took no steps to reconstruct it despite repeated reminders, so the court dismissed the case for non-prosecution along with all pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
206-3
STC-6-2002 Decided on : 12.12.2024
M/s Madhu Travels and Roadways . . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: None.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
December 12, 2024 J.Ram
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JAWALA RAM 2024.12.13 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
M/s Madhu Travels and Roadways
State of Haryana
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
