Regular second appeal dismissed in default for want of prosecution after the appellant's counsel withdrew from the case and no other appearance was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
102
RSA-690-1998 (O&M) and COCP-1049-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision.:14.08.2024
Chaman Lal Appellant Vs. Usha Kumari Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. N.S. Gill, Advocate for Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that his client has taken brief from him and so, he withdraw his power of a"orney.
Nobody else had appeared on behalf of the appellant. There is no jus&fica&on for issuing fresh no&ce.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu&on.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE
August 14, 2024 Nee&ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.08.14 15:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Chaman Lal
Usha Kumari
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
