M/S G.K. Enterprises and Anr. v. Vinod Mittal
Case brief
What is this about?
**** 124 CR-1630-2024 (O&M) Date of…
**** 124 CR-1630-2024 (O&M) Date of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AT CHANDIGARH
********
124
CR-1630-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision.:13.08.2024
M/s G.K. Enterprises and another Pe,,oners Vs. Vinod Mi.al Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: None for the pe��oners-applicants/tenants. Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate for the respondent- landlord.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the
pe��oners-applicants/tenants.
Learned counsel for the respondent- landlord has drawn a#en�on towards the paper-book in order to contend that ejectment pe��on filed by the respondent- landlord was allowed by learned Rent Controller on 18.01.2024 on the ground of ‘non-payment’ of rent. The order of the Rent Controller was upheld by the Appellate Authority by way of order dated 01.03.2024. The landlord then filed the execu�on pe��on. Against the orders passed by the Courts below, the present revision was filed by the Tenants.
In the present revision, no stay has been granted �ll date by this Court. Rather the tenant moved an applica�on bearing No.CM-7065-2024 seeking appropriate and reasonable �me to vacate the tenanted premises so as to relocate the machinery and fixtures installed therein. The said applica�on is dated 18.04.2024.
Learned counsel for the respondent- landlord informs that �ll date no steps whatsoever has been taken by the tenants so as to remove/relocate the machinery and that adjournment is being sought by him before the Execu�ng Court on the ground that present revision is pending.
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.08.13 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-1630-2024 (O&M)
-2-
As has been no�ced above that there is no representa�on on behalf of the pe��oners-applicants/tenants. No steps has been taken by the applicants �ll date so as to vacate the premises despite pendency of the execu�on.
As such, present revision pe��on is hereby dismissed in default for want
of prosecu�on. The Execu�ng Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.
Pending applica�on(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE
August 13, 2024
Nee�ka Tuteja
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.08.13 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s G.K. Enterprises and another
Vinod Mal
DEEPAK GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court