of half share along with Dhan Singh son of Rati Ram @ Ratia and Jit Singh son of Rati Ram, who had 1/4th share each. Defendant-appellant No.4 is the wife of Jit Singh and defendant-appellant Nos.1 to 3 are her daughters-inlaw. It was further averred that the defendant-appellants have no right, title or interest in the suit land and that she has illegally claimed herself to be the widow of Bir Singh son of Ratia. It was also averred that the defendantappellant No.4 got a mutation of inheritance No.2321 qua the property of Bir Singh entered in her favour pursuant to the order dated 18.10.2012 passed by the District Revenue Officer-cum-Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Jind. Against the said order the plaintiff-respondents and co-sharers preferred an appeal before the Collector, Jind which was accepted vide order dated 14.05.2013 and the order passed by the District Revenue Officer-cumAssistant Collector Ist Grade was set aside. However, in the meantime defendant-appellant No.4 took undue advantage of the order dated 18.10.2012 and got the sale deed dated 05.03.2013 executed in favour of defendant-appellant Nos.1 to 3 and mutation was also sanctioned on the basis of the said sale deed. It was further averred that the defendantappellant No.4 got mutation No.3131 dated 31.08.2004 entered in her name on the basis of the order dated 19.03.2004 passed by the Commissioner, Hisar Division whereas the said order was set aside by the Financial Commissioner vide order dated 06.01.2015. Hence, the suit. The defendantappellants put in their appearance and filed their written statements. They pleaded that defendant-appellant No.4 was the wife of Bir Singh. It was further averred that a civil suit was filed being Civil Suit No.552 dated 01.11.2008 titled as ‘Murti Devi vs. Ramesh Kumar etc.’ decided on 20.10.2012 wherein it was held that Murti Devi was widow of Bir Singh and
