Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the revision petition after arguing for some time; the court permitted and dismissed it as withdrawn, disposing of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:022738
122
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-960-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.02.2024
Parhlad Dass @ Prlad Kumar ... Petitioner(s) Versus Nannu Lal ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Dhiraj Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
16.02.2024 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Yogesh Sharma 2024.02.19 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh
Parhlad Dass @ Prlad Kumar
Nannu Lal
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
