Regular Second Appeal by defendants against concurrent findings decreeing a suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff. No counsel or instructions appeared for the appellants; the appeal was dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
201
RSA-4776-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision.:20.09.2024
Makhan and Others
Appellants
Vs.
Biban and Another Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Kuljit Singh, Advocate for Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for the respondents.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the defendants against the concurrent findings of the Court below, whereby suit for declara$on filed by the plain$ff (respondent herein) was decreed and the appeal thereagainst by the defendants- appellants was dismissed.
Mr. Kuljit Singh, Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the appellants and submits that despite sending le(ers to the appellants, there is no instruc$ons on behalf of the appellants. Nobody else has appeared on behalf of the appellants.
It appears that appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu$on.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE
September 20, 2024 Nee$ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.09.20 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Makhan and Others
Biban and Another
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
