Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition; counsel made a statement to that effect and the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
110 CR-5457-2024 Date of Decision.:20.09.2024
Didar Singh Pe--oner Vs. Kamaljit Kaur and Others Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Ms. Farheen Bajwa, Advocate for Mr. Karandeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the pe��oner has made a statement, so as to
withdraw the pe��on.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE
September 20, 2024 Nee�ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.09.20 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Didar Singh
Kamaljit Kaur
Others
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
