The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the last date of hearing and did not put in appearance despite registry intimations, indicating a lack of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
740
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-3769-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.11.2024
Chander Parkash Gupta
......Appellant(s)
Vs.
State of Haryana
......Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA.J. (ORAL)
November 19, 2024 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes / No
TRIPTI SAINI 2024.11.22 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Chander Parkash Gupta
State of Haryana
Sudeepi Sharma
Tripti Saini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
