Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the appellant nor counsel appeared, despite absence also noted on the previous hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(222)
RSA No.2321-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.10.2024
KASHM I R SINGH ...Appellant Versu s
MOHAN SINGH ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present:None for the appellant.
Mr.A.D.S.Sukhija, Advocat e and Mr. Ish Karan Singh Chhabr a , Advocate for the respondent.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
None has put in appearanc e on behalf of the appellant. S a me was the p o sition on the last date of hearin g .
The present appeal is a ccordingly dismissed for n on-
prosecuti o n.
(PANKAJ JAIN) 15.10.2024 JUDGE raman
W h ether speaking/reasoned Yes/No W h ether reportable Yes/No
Raman Kumar 2024.10.15 22:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kashmir Singh
Mohan Singh
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
