Regular suit appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants and several respondents reside abroad, one respondent died and another remained unserved; liberty granted to seek revival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[218] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
RSA-13 0 -1999 (O&M) Date of D ecision : 14.10.2024
Kundan S ingh and others …Appellants
versus
Charan S i ngh and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] As per the service report, ap p ellant Nos.1 to 5 are stated to be residing a broad. Respondent No.1 has d ied. Respondent No.2 remaine d unserved. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 are als o stated to be residing abroad.
[2] Dismissed for non prosecution. However, liberty is grante d to the par t ies to seek revival of the prese n t appeal, if need be.
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
14.10.20 2 4
‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.10.16 04:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kundan Singh and others
Charan Singh and others
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
