Second appeal from 2003; no party or counsel appeared despite notice on two occasions. The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, reserving liberty to the appellant to seek revival if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
687
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-2270-2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.12.2024
Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Panchkula ......Appellant
Vs.
Siri Chand Sharma ......Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
19.12.2024 Virrendra
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2024.12.21 12:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Panchkula
Siri Chand Sharma
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
