First appeal from 2006 dismissed for want of prosecution after no appearance by appellants despite notice; liberty reserved to seek revival if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
348
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-902-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.12.2024
Partap Singh and others
......Appellants
Vs.
Sukhchain Singh alias Gori and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)
the appeal in case any cause of action survives.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
19.12.2024 Virrendra
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2024.12.21 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Partap Singh and others
Sukhchain Singh alias Gori
Another
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
