Income-tax reference dismissed for non-prosecution after the case file was burnt in a Registry fire incident and the parties failed to take steps to reconstruct it despite repeated reminders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
101
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITR-66-1996 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.10.2024
C.I.T. PAT I ALA.
. . . . Petitio n er
Vs.
SH. B.RAI.
. . . . Respondent
**_****_ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH ******
Present None.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH)
JUDGE
October 14, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Wh e ther speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Wh e ther reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.10.16 09:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
C.I.T. Patiala
Sh. B. Rai
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
