Case file destroyed in a Registry fire; parties failed to take steps for reconstruction despite repeated reminders. The court dismissed the case for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
210
CCEC-2-2003
Decided on : 03.10.2024
CCE Chandigarh
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
M/s Kalsi Steels
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: None.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
October 03, 2024 J.Ram
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JAWALA RAM 2024.10.14 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CCE Chandigarh
M/s Kalsi Steels
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
