Insurance company's appeal from 2006 was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the appellant nor its counsel appeared despite notice on repeated hearings, indicating loss of interest in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
302-5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-4990-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.12.2024
New India Assurance Company Limited
......Appellant
Vs.
Ashok Kumar and others ......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
04.12.2024 Virrendra
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2024.12.06 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution when the appellant fails to appear despite notice.
New India Assurance Company Limited
Ashok Kumar
others
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
