Appeal against dismissal of a claim petition by Award dated 06.10.2009. No one appeared for either party despite notice by e-mail; the appeal was dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-3614-2010 Date of Decision: September 20, 2024
Mukh.ar Singh … Appellant
Versus
Lakhbir Singh alias Lucky and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The claim pe��on was dismissed by way of impugned Award dated 06.10.2009. The claimant has filed the present appeal. Today, nobody has appeared on behalf of any of the par�es, despite the fact that both the counsels for the par�es have been informed through e-mail, as reported by the Registry. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
September 20, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.09.20 02:23 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
Mukhtar Singh
Lakhbir Singh alias Lucky and others
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
