A one-line oral order disposing a writ petition seeking to set aside an order cancelling the petitioners' earlier posting and posting them at far away places, noting that the claim became insignificant due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
399
CWP-9780-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13..05.2024
JAIMAL SINGH AND ORS
… PETITIONERS
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr.Daljit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners (through VC).
Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
It is a matter of posting at one District vis-à-vis another District.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
13.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.13 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JAIMAL SINGH AND ORS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
