Court disposed of the petition wherein the petitioner assailed the recruitment of private respondents without advertisement. Held appointment cannot be disturbed at this belated stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
384
CWP-4283-2002
Date of Decision : 13..05.2024
BHARPUR BHARTI … PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.Sahil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
client.
survives.
13.05.2024 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.13 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
BHARPUR BHARTI
STATE OF PUNJAB
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
