A 2001 writ petition sought appointment of the petitioners as Principals. Counsel conceded the cause of action may not survive due to efflux of time. The court disposed of the petition with liberty to seek revival if the need arises.
Liberty granted to petitioners to seek revival of the disposed petition if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
378
CWP-8206-2001 Date of decision: 17.05.2024
Subhash Arora and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab.
AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 17.05.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.05.18 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a 2001 petition seeking appointment as Principals survives after efflux of time.
Subhash Arora and others
State of Punjab
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
