Gautam v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a murder and Arms Act FIR. Counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, which the court permitted.
Regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a murder and Arms Act FIR. Counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, which the court permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
202 CRM- M -10063-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.05.2024
Gautam
.. P etitioner
Versus
State of Hary a na
.. R espondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: M r. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate for t he petitioner.
M r. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. A G , Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J (Oral)
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 16.05.2024 JUDGE ashok W hether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No W hether reportable : Y es/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.05.16 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Gautam
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court