A trade union sought directions for payment of members' salaries by FCI since 1993; counsel for respondents stated members were regularized and paid since 1995, which petitioner could not controvert, so petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-737-1998 1
2024:PHHC:045443
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
203-2 CWP-737-1998 Date of Decision : 04.04.2024
PUNJAB PARDESH PALLEDAR MAZDOOR … PETITIONER
Versus
FCI & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.H.S.Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. B .S.Patwalia, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Masih, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
controvert the aforesaid statement.
present petition stands disposed of.
| 04.04.2024 | (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|
| anju | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
Anju Goel 2024.04.04 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FCI should be directed to pay salary to the trade union's members working since March 1993.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Punjab Pardesh Palledar Mazdoor
FCI & Ors.
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
