Petitioner sought passport direction despite pending FIRs. Court applied prior precedent, directing petitioner to appear before passport authority with documents. Authority to decide within eight weeks.
Direction to appear before passport authority on 25.04.2024; authority to pass appropriate order within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
����������������� CWP No.5840 of 2024 Date of Decision:03.04.2024
Karandeep Singh
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Shubham Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms.Sehej Sandhawalia, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
Majitha, District Amritsar has been compromised and police has not filed its PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.04.03 05:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CWP No.5840 of 2024 -2- �����������������
report. FIR No.63 dated 27.04.2020, under Sections 456, 436, 427, 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Majitha, District Amritsar is still pending and police have not filed its report.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
03.04.2024 paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.04.03 05:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for issuance of passport pending involvement in three FIRs.
Whether the passport authority must be directed to consider the case swiftly under a specific precedent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mohan Lal @ Mohna vs. Union of India and othersApplied¶20
Mohan Lal @ Mohna vs. Union of India and others 2023 SCC Online P&H 1391. · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Karandeep Singh
Union of India
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
