Petitioner sought release of her son's death-cum-retiral benefits through writ petition. The Court held the petition was not maintainable since she had already availed the alternative remedy of a civil suit pending before the Civil Court at Malerkotla, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-724-2023
1 2024:PHHC:061247
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
111
CWP-724-2023 Date of Decision : 03.05.2024
JASPAL KAUR … PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.Chinku Bawa, Advocate and Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advocate for Mr. HPS Ishar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
Ms. Deepa Negi, Advocate for Mr. S.S.Swaich, Advocate for respondent No.5.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Anju Goel 2024.05.03 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-724-2023
2 2024:PHHC:061247
petition is not maintainable.
4. Dismissed.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
03.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.03 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for death-cum-retiral benefits is maintainable when the petitioner has already filed a civil suit on the same cause of action.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jaspal Kaur
State of Punjab
Respondent No.5
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
