The petitioner sought a direction to issue a passport. The counsel for the petitioner sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a proper application before the passport authority, which the court allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-6676-2024
1 2024:PHHC:060499
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102 CWP-6676-2024 Date of Decision : 02.05.2024
BUTA RAM SHARMA … PETITIONER
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr.Hasrat Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Singh, Central Govt. Counsel for the respondents-UOI.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Anju Goel 2024.05.02 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-6676-2024
2 2024:PHHC:060499
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
02.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.02 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for issuance of a passport should be dismissed as withdrawn?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Buta Ram Sharma
Union of India
Another
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
