Writ petition challenging rejection of a candidate on medical grounds of bilateral gynaecomastia. After a review medical board found the petitioner unfit for being overweight, no one appeared on his behalf on successive dates, and the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
252 CWP-7 0 92-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.12.2024
Yogesh
..Petitioner
Versus
Union of Indi a and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: N one for the petitioner. M r. Arihant Goyal, Sr. Panel Co u nsel, Union of India.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
“In compliance o f order dated 04.09.2024, the petitioner has been medic a lly examined and the report of the Review Medical Board h as been placed on record a nd according to which, the p e titioner was found to be ‘unfit’ on account of being ‘overwei g ht’. However, there is n o representation on behalf of the petitioner in Court today. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 25.10.2024.”
the case havin g been called out twice. 4. D ismissed for non-prosecution.
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 04.12.2024 JUDGE ashok W hether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No W hether reportable : Y es/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.12.05 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Yogesh
Union of India and another
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
