Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108+241
CWP-6687-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.12.2024
Parminder Singh Brar
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Kumar Jund, Sr. Panel Counsel for the respondents-UOI.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
03.12.2024 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.12.04 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parminder Singh Brar
Union of India
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
