Petitioner sought disability pension claimed to be caused by service. Court directed government to reconsider claim relying on Supreme Court precedent, noting no merit comment.
Direction to respondents to reconsider the petitioner's disability pension claim within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-24187-2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108
CWP-24187-2024
Date of decision: 02.12.2024
Atma Ram
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Ravi Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
HAMANT 2024.12.04 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-24187-2024
2
����������������������������������������������.
2. Notice of motion.
| (AMAN C J |
HAUDHARY) UDGE |
|
|---|---|---|
| 02.12.2024 | ||
| Hemant | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes |
/ No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes |
/ No |
HAMANT 2024.12.04 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, invalided out of service due to chronic Papillitis, is entitled to 50% disability pension based on the Sukhvinder Singh judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukhvinder Singh vs. Union of India and othersRelied on¶1
Sukhvinder Singh vs. Union of India and others, 2014(4) S.C.T. 163
Atma Ram
Union of India
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
