Petitioner challenged closure of her passport application, citing spelling discrepancies in parents' names and pending suit to cancel her adoption deed. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to approach the Civil Court for expeditious disposal of the suit; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
2024:PHHC:059461 CWP No. 3563 of 2024 Date of Decision:01.05.2024
Jasleen Kaur @ Jasleen Kaur Brar
….Petitioner
vs.
Regional Passport Officer and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Shweta Nahata, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1 The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of letter dated 16.11.2023 (Annexure P-21) whereby her application for passport has been closed.
Civil Court at Baghapurana. The respondents have rejected application of PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.01 04:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No. 3563 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:059461
the petitioner on the ground that there is difference in the spelling of parents name in different identity cards.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
01.05.2024 paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | Yes | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.01 04:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jasleen Kaur @ Jasleen Kaur Brar
Regional Passport Officer
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
