Disposed

Malkit Singh Alias Malkiat Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Mar 2024CWP/6456/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge High Court disposed of a Writ Petition filed regarding delay in sanctioning mutation of deposited land. It directed the SDM to decide the petitioners' representation dated 10.02.2021 within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to SDM, Amloh to decide the petitioners' representation dated 10.02.2021 within four weeks.

Malkit Singh Alias Malkiat Sin… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

147

¶2

��

¶3

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No.6456 of 2024 Date of Decision: 18.03.2024

¶5

Malkit Singh @ Malkiat Singh and others

¶6

..... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

..... Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

¶11

¶12

Present: Ms. Arzoo Modi, Advocate for Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶13

¶14

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Present writ petition has been filed for directing respondents No.5 and 6, especially respondent No.6 to sanction the mutation of land in favour of the petitioners on the basis of order dated 31.05.2011 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.5 as more than 13 years have been passed since the passing of the order but till date the revenue authorities have not updated the revenue record by sanctioning the mutation in favour of the petitioners inspite of the fact that petitioners have deposited the compensation/amount as calculated by the revenue authorities much earlier.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for the redressal of their grievances, the petitioners have already filed a representation dated 10.02.2021 (Annexure P-5) before respondent No.5 but no action has been taken on the same till date.

¶17

RITTU 2024.03.19 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CWP No.6456 of 2024

2024:PHHC:038298

-2-

Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr. Navneet Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. He submits that the representation filed by the petitioners would be decided expeditiously.

¶23

In view of the above position, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 i.e. SDM, Amloh, District Fatehgarh Sahib to look into the representation of the petitioners dated 10.02.2021 (Annexure P-5) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

¶24

		(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE
18.03.2024
rittu
	Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
	Whether reportable	: Yes/No

¶25

RITTU 2024.03.19 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Malkit Singh Alias Malkiat Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malkit Singh Alias Malkiat Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shishpal Vs Superintending Canal Officer and Ors.

Rajinder Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Jaswinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Another

Akshay Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Raja Ram Vs State of Haryana and Other

Malkit Singh Vs Financial Commissioner Revenue (Appeals) and Others