Petitioner sought a passport; counsel reported it had been received, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous without adjudicating any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
101
����������������� CWP-6154-2024 Date of Decision:22.04.2024
RAVINDER KUMAR
….Petitioner
vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Vineet Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Amrita Singh, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India (through VC)
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
received passport, thus, the present petition has rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
22.04.2024
paramjit
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes
Whether reportable: No
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.04.22 03:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ravinder Kumar
Union of India and Others
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
