In this CWP, the petitioner challenged the rejection of his claim for arrears of wage revision. The petitioner argued he was eligible under a retrospective notification. The High Court disposed of the petition without addressing the substantive issues, relying on the respondant's representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:053477
113
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-10251-2023 Date of Decision: 22.04.2024
LOGESH KUMAR P.
...Petitioner
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondents.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
HIMANSHU 2024.04.22 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CWP-10251-2023
-2-
revised. The eligibility for revision of allowances has been mentioned in Clause 1 of notification dated 26.10.2022. Clause I of the notification reads
as :
“Eligibility.
1.1 In terms of paragraph 1 of the Amendment Scheme 2022, the Scheme applies, save as otherwise provided, to all Class I Officers, who:(1) were in service as on 1st August 2017 and continue to be in service on the date of publication of the Amendment Scheme 2022; or
(ii) were in service as on 1st August 2017 and have died, or retired on reaching the age of superannuation or opted for voluntary retirement; or
(iii) were appointed on any date after 1st August 2017.
resignation was accepted on 17.10.2020, thus, he is eligible for arrears of wage revision, however, respondent has rejected his claim.
| (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.04.2024 | JUDGE | |
| himanshu | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
HIMANSHU 2024.04.22 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the rejection of the petitioner's claim for arrears of wage revision.
Whether the petitioner is eligible for the wage revision under the Amendment Scheme 2022.
How to dispose of the petition given the respondent's representation that a fresh claim may be filed.
Logesh Kumar P.
National Insurance Company Ltd.
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
